Make a Donation

Lots of time and effort goes into creating and maintaining this site. If we've helped you, consider making a donation.  

Current Poll

I'm thinking that the new pope should be...
 

Support Us!

Buy theophiles merchandise from our store!

The Google taboo: won't give Christian group a voice on abortion-but allows porn, adultery
Abortion & Life
Written by SasyMomaCat   
Saturday, 12 April 2008 15:25

Spotted at the Daily Mail:

Google is facing a global backlash from internet users over its refusal to carry advertisements for a British Christian group.

The Christian Institute accused the popular search engine of having a "warped value system" after pointing out that it does allow adverts for "pornography and instruments of violence".

Websites selling knuckle-dusters and ouija boards as well as dating sites designed for married people who want to have affairs are advertised on Google.

But the company turned down the non-denominational Christian charity which wanted to pay Google so that whenever the word "abortion" was typed in, its link would appear on the right hand side of the screen.

Comments
Search
wezlo  - I saw this...   |2008-04-12 21:03:19
...and I was thinking about posting it - but it's a private business so they are allowed to refuse advertising clients (at least in the US - this is over in England so I'm not sure what the rules are over there).

So, as much as I might look at google's decision and go, "huh?" there really isn't much to do about it.
Entity   |2008-04-12 22:36:11
>>but it's a private business so they are allowed to refuse advertising clients

Are they? It seems that people who rent can't discriminate based on religion or lack there of. Employers can't discriminate based on religion or lack there of. I doubt I could refuse to sell goods to someone based on religion or lack there of.

Could a billboard company refuse to rent to a religious or atheist group? I don't know.

I happen to think Google should have the right to do this, but I don't know if they actually do. If they are saying they will have non-religious anti-abortion ads, but not religious anti-abortion ads, they seem to be violating a law that appears to be in place even though it probably shouldn't be.
OrionBlastar   |2008-04-13 01:14:47
In the USA they cannot discriminate for religious or non-religious reasons. Both private and public organizations are subject to the same anti-discrimination laws.

In the UK it might be different as they use different laws. But it should work the same as human rights in the USA and cover religion or non-religious groups as well via freedom of speech freedom of expression.
OrionBlastar  - Google private?   |2008-04-13 01:09:22
http://www.news.com/Google-files-for-unusual-2....
Google filed for an IPO of $2.7 billion in 2004. IPO stands for initial public offering of stock in Google.

Even if Google was a private organization they are still subject to civil rights and the US Constitution.

But this was in England, and I am sure UK law has civil rights that cover protection for religious groups. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Act_1998
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_th...

Quote:

Regarded as one of the most important human rights, the courts have stated that there is no difference between the protection offered by the common law, and that guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights[5]. The freedom of expression of Members of Parliament is encouraged and guaranteed by parliamentary privilege.

The right can be restricted where it is justified in the public interest, for example where national security concerns prevail (see the case of Ponting) or where countervailing interests of privacy, public order or religious tolerance must take priority. In addition, the law may also require that in certain situations information is kept confidential or may place a restriction on its dissemination. This is the case of the confidentiality and defamation laws, as well as the offence of contempt of court. Television, radio and other broadcast media are also subject to legal regulation (see for example the Press Complaints Commission and Ofcom).

Freedom of conscience is related to the freedom of expression and allows an individual to hold certain views without fear of persecution, it also includes the freedom of religion.


Religious tolerance must take priority. It is not a matter of public safety and it is a freedom of expression covered by UK and European law and human rights. A web site is just another form of media, Google is a media company subject to the same laws a broadcast media company would have.
jonathanbrickman0000  - Gigablast -- a good alternative   |2008-04-13 09:12:22
Gigablast searches a database larger than Yahoo, almost as large as Google -- and it brings up useful pages which both Yahoo and Google throw out.

http://www.gigablast.com

(I am not afiliated with Gigablast!)

J.E.B.
Only registered users can write comments!

3.20 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated on Saturday, 12 April 2008 23:17
 

Our valuable member SasyMomaCat has been with us since Monday, 07 April 2008.

Show Other Articles


Statistics

Members : 38515
Content : 1256
Content View Hits : 5898911

Who's Online

We have 107 guests and 27 members online
  • emperorbma
  • Strangstalieno
  • ztjszsms
  • Anddcusn
  • SakeRernarl
  • Ankvkxrv
  • Engetgync
  • Domipiree
  • cpcc867j
  • CagsAttesia
  • CowVesscose
  • Antibbown
  • NerectertyGep
  • AccuctSoche
  • tautBeave
  • Anddcusm
  • ByngeaxDyense
  • enliceHon
  • vjbztyg
  • elentetouloum